Proving The Isometry Of Dual Bochner Spaces When S Is Atomic

by JurnalWarga.com 61 views
Iklan Headers

Hey guys! Today, we're diving deep into a fascinating topic in functional analysis: proving the isometry (Lp(S;X))=Lq(S;X)(L^p(S;X))^*=L^q(S;X^*) when SS is an atomic measure space. This is a crucial result in the realm of Banach spaces, especially when dealing with Bochner spaces. We'll break down the concepts, theorems, and steps involved in this proof, making it super clear and easy to grasp. So, let's get started!

Understanding the Foundation

Before we jump into the proof, let's ensure we have a solid understanding of the fundamental concepts. This will make the entire process smoother and more intuitive. We'll start by defining the key terms and then move on to the theorems that play a crucial role in this proof.

Atomic Measure Space

First off, what exactly is an atomic measure space? Well, imagine a measure space (S,A,μ)(S, \mathscr{A}, \mu) where the measure μ\mu is concentrated on individual points. In simpler terms, an atomic measure space is one where the set SS can be broken down into a countable number of atoms. An atom, in this context, is a measurable set AA such that μ(A)>0\mu(A) > 0, and for any measurable subset BB of AA, either μ(B)=0\mu(B) = 0 or μ(B)=μ(A)\mu(B) = \mu(A).

Think of it like this: you have a collection of points, and each point carries a certain "weight" or measure. The total measure is just the sum of these individual weights. This is in contrast to a continuous measure space, where the measure is spread out smoothly over the space. Atomic measure spaces are super common and pop up in various contexts, making their properties quite important.

Bochner Spaces

Next, let's talk about Bochner spaces. A Bochner space, denoted as Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X), is essentially a generalization of the familiar LpL^p spaces to functions taking values in a Banach space XX. Here, (S,A,μ)(S, \mathscr{A}, \mu) is our measure space, and XX is a Banach space (a complete normed vector space).

A function f:SXf: S \rightarrow X is Bochner measurable if it can be approximated by simple functions. A simple function is just a finite linear combination of indicator functions, each multiplied by a vector in XX. The Bochner integral extends the usual Lebesgue integral to these Banach space-valued functions. The norm in Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X) is defined as:

fLp(S;X)=(Sf(s)Xpdμ(s))1/p,||f||_{L^p(S;X)} = \left( \int_S ||f(s)||_X^p d\mu(s) \right)^{1/p},

for 1p<1 \leq p < \infty. For p=p = \infty, we have:

fL(S;X)=ess supsSf(s)X.||f||_{L^\infty(S;X)} = \text{ess sup}_{s \in S} ||f(s)||_X.

Bochner spaces are fundamental in studying vector-valued functions and are widely used in areas like partial differential equations, stochastic analysis, and optimization.

Dual Spaces and Duality

Now, let's move on to dual spaces and duality. The dual space of a Banach space XX, denoted as XX^*, is the space of all bounded linear functionals from XX to the scalar field (usually the real numbers R\mathbb{R} or complex numbers C\mathbb{C}). These bounded linear functionals are linear maps f:XFf: X \rightarrow \mathbb{F} (where F\mathbb{F} is the scalar field) that satisfy the boundedness condition:

f(x)MxX|f(x)| \leq M ||x||_X

for some constant MM and all xXx \in X. The norm of a bounded linear functional ff is defined as:

fX=supxX=1f(x).||f||_{X^*} = \sup_{||x||_X = 1} |f(x)|.

The concept of duality is all about understanding the relationship between a space and its dual. Duality theorems, such as the one we're aiming to prove, tell us how the dual of one space can be represented in terms of another related space. This is immensely useful because it allows us to transfer problems and solutions between different spaces, often simplifying the analysis.

Hölder's Inequality

One theorem that's crucial for our proof is Hölder's inequality. For scalar-valued functions, Hölder's inequality states that if fLp(S)f \in L^p(S) and gLq(S)g \in L^q(S), where 1<p<1 < p < \infty, 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1, then fgL1(S)fg \in L^1(S) and

Sf(s)g(s)dμ(s)(Sf(s)pdμ(s))1/p(Sg(s)qdμ(s))1/q.\int_S |f(s)g(s)| d\mu(s) \leq \left( \int_S |f(s)|^p d\mu(s) \right)^{1/p} \left( \int_S |g(s)|^q d\mu(s) \right)^{1/q}.

This inequality is also valid for Bochner spaces. If fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X) and gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*), where XX^* is the dual of XX, then we have a similar inequality involving the duality pairing:

Sf(s),g(s)dμ(s)(Sf(s)Xpdμ(s))1/p(Sg(s)Xqdμ(s))1/q,\int_S |\langle f(s), g(s) \rangle| d\mu(s) \leq \left( \int_S ||f(s)||_X^p d\mu(s) \right)^{1/p} \left( \int_S ||g(s)||_{X^*}^q d\mu(s) \right)^{1/q},

where f(s),g(s)\langle f(s), g(s) \rangle denotes the application of the functional g(s)Xg(s) \in X^* to the element f(s)Xf(s) \in X.

The Proposition: (Lp(S;X))=Lq(S;X)(L^p(S;X))^*=L^q(S;X^*)

Now that we've laid the groundwork, let's state the proposition we're aiming to prove. The proposition states that for 1<p<1 < p < \infty and 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1, and when SS is an atomic measure space, the dual space of Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X), denoted as (Lp(S;X))(L^p(S; X))^*, is isometric to Lq(S;X)L^q(S; X^*). In mathematical notation:

(Lp(S;X))Lq(S;X).(L^p(S;X))^* \cong L^q(S;X^*).

This result is powerful because it tells us that every bounded linear functional on Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X) can be represented as integration against a function in Lq(S;X)L^q(S; X^*), and vice versa. This representation simplifies many problems involving linear functionals on Bochner spaces.

Breaking Down the Proof

So, how do we prove this awesome proposition? The proof typically involves several key steps:

  1. Defining a Natural Map: We start by defining a natural map Φ\Phi from Lq(S;X)L^q(S; X^*) into (Lp(S;X))(L^p(S; X))^*. This map essentially associates each function gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*) with a bounded linear functional on Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X).
  2. Showing Φ\Phi is a Bounded Linear Operator: We need to show that Φ\Phi is both linear and bounded. This ensures that the map behaves nicely and preserves the structure of the spaces involved.
  3. Proving Φ\Phi is an Isometry: This is a crucial step where we demonstrate that Φ\Phi preserves the norm, i.e., Φ(g)=g||\Phi(g)|| = ||g|| for all gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*). This shows that the map is a faithful representation of Lq(S;X)L^q(S; X^*) within (Lp(S;X))(L^p(S; X))^*.
  4. Showing Φ\Phi is Surjective: Finally, we need to prove that Φ\Phi maps onto the entire dual space (Lp(S;X))(L^p(S; X))^*. This ensures that every bounded linear functional on Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X) can be represented by a function in Lq(S;X)L^q(S; X^*).

Let's dive into each of these steps in detail.

1. Defining the Natural Map Φ\Phi

Given a function gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*), we define the map Φ:Lq(S;X)(Lp(S;X))\Phi: L^q(S; X^*) \rightarrow (L^p(S; X))^* as follows. For any fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X), we define Φ(g)\Phi(g) as the linear functional that acts on ff by:

[Φ(g)](f)=Sf(s),g(s)dμ(s),[\Phi(g)](f) = \int_S \langle f(s), g(s) \rangle d\mu(s),

where f(s),g(s)\langle f(s), g(s) \rangle represents the duality pairing between f(s)Xf(s) \in X and g(s)Xg(s) \in X^*. In simple terms, Φ(g)\Phi(g) takes a function ff and returns the integral of the pointwise application of gg to ff.

This definition is quite natural. It mirrors how we often represent linear functionals in LpL^p spaces, using integration against a function in the dual space. The key here is to ensure that this map is well-defined and behaves as we expect.

2. Showing Φ\Phi is a Bounded Linear Operator

Next, we need to show that Φ\Phi is a bounded linear operator. This involves two parts:

  • Linearity: We need to show that Φ\Phi preserves linear combinations. That is, for any g1,g2Lq(S;X)g_1, g_2 \in L^q(S; X^*) and scalars a,ba, b, we need to show that Φ(ag1+bg2)=aΦ(g1)+bΦ(g2)\Phi(ag_1 + bg_2) = a\Phi(g_1) + b\Phi(g_2).

    Let's verify this. For any fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X), we have:

    [Φ(ag1+bg2)](f)=Sf(s),ag1(s)+bg2(s)dμ(s)=S[af(s),g1(s)+bf(s),g2(s)]dμ(s)=aSf(s),g1(s)dμ(s)+bSf(s),g2(s)dμ(s)=a[Φ(g1)](f)+b[Φ(g2)](f).\begin{aligned} [\Phi(ag_1 + bg_2)](f) &= \int_S \langle f(s), ag_1(s) + bg_2(s) \rangle d\mu(s) \\ &= \int_S [a \langle f(s), g_1(s) \rangle + b \langle f(s), g_2(s) \rangle] d\mu(s) \\ &= a \int_S \langle f(s), g_1(s) \rangle d\mu(s) + b \int_S \langle f(s), g_2(s) \rangle d\mu(s) \\ &= a [\Phi(g_1)](f) + b [\Phi(g_2)](f). \end{aligned}

    Thus, Φ(ag1+bg2)=aΦ(g1)+bΦ(g2)\Phi(ag_1 + bg_2) = a\Phi(g_1) + b\Phi(g_2), so Φ\Phi is linear. Awesome!

  • Boundedness: We need to show that there exists a constant MM such that Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))MgLq(S;X)||\,\Phi(g)\,||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \leq M ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)} for all gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*). In other words, we need to control the norm of the linear functional Φ(g)\Phi(g) by the norm of the function gg.

    To do this, we use Hölder's inequality. Recall that the norm of a linear functional T(Lp(S;X))T \in (L^p(S; X))^* is given by:

    T(Lp(S;X))=supfLp(S;X)=1T(f).||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} = \sup_{||f||_{L^p(S; X)} = 1} |T(f)|.

    So, we want to estimate [Φ(g)](f)|[\Phi(g)](f)| for fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X) with fLp(S;X)=1||f||_{L^p(S; X)} = 1. Using Hölder's inequality for Bochner spaces, we have:

    [Φ(g)](f)=Sf(s),g(s)dμ(s)Sf(s),g(s)dμ(s)(Sf(s)Xpdμ(s))1/p(Sg(s)Xqdμ(s))1/q=fLp(S;X)gLq(S;X).\begin{aligned} |[\Phi(g)](f)| &= \left| \int_S \langle f(s), g(s) \rangle d\mu(s) \right| \\ &\leq \int_S |\langle f(s), g(s) \rangle| d\mu(s) \\ &\leq \left( \int_S ||f(s)||_X^p d\mu(s) \right)^{1/p} \left( \int_S ||g(s)||_{X^*}^q d\mu(s) \right)^{1/q} \\ &= ||f||_{L^p(S; X)} ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}. \end{aligned}

    Since we're considering ff with fLp(S;X)=1||f||_{L^p(S; X)} = 1, we get:

    [Φ(g)](f)gLq(S;X).|[\Phi(g)](f)| \leq ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}.

    Taking the supremum over all such ff, we find:

    Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))=supfLp(S;X)=1[Φ(g)](f)gLq(S;X).||\Phi(g)||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} = \sup_{||f||_{L^p(S; X)} = 1} |[\Phi(g)](f)| \leq ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}.

    Thus, Φ\Phi is bounded with a bound of M=1M = 1. Fantastic!

3. Proving Φ\Phi is an Isometry

Now, let's show that Φ\Phi is an isometry. This means we need to prove that Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))=gLq(S;X)||\,\Phi(g)\,||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} = ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)} for all gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*). We've already shown that Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))gLq(S;X)||\,\Phi(g)\,||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \leq ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}; now, we need to show the reverse inequality.

Since SS is an atomic measure space, we can write S={si}iIS = \{s_i\}_{i \in I}, where II is a countable index set. Let μi=μ({si})\mu_i = \mu(\{s_i\}) be the measure of the atom {si}\{s_i\}. Then, for any fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X) and gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*), the integrals become sums:

Sf(s)Xpdμ(s)=iIf(si)Xpμi,\int_S ||f(s)||_X^p d\mu(s) = \sum_{i \in I} ||f(s_i)||_X^p \mu_i,

and

Sg(s)Xqdμ(s)=iIg(si)Xqμi.\int_S ||g(s)||_{X^*}^q d\mu(s) = \sum_{i \in I} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^q \mu_i.

For each sis_i, we can use the definition of the norm in XX^* to find a vector xiXx_i \in X with xiX=1||x_i||_X = 1 such that

xi,g(si)(1ϵ)g(si)X,|\langle x_i, g(s_i) \rangle| \geq (1 - \epsilon) ||g(s_i)||_{X^*},

for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0. Now, let's define a function fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X) by

f(si)=μiq/pg(si)Xq/p1sgn(xi,g(si))xi,f(s_i) = \mu_i^{q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1} \text{sgn}(\langle x_i, g(s_i) \rangle) x_i,

where sgn(z)=z/z\text{sgn}(z) = z/|z| if z0z \neq 0 and 00 if z=0z = 0. Then,

f(si)X=μiq/pg(si)Xq/p1xiX=μiq/pg(si)Xq/p1.||f(s_i)||_X = \mu_i^{q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1} ||x_i||_X = \mu_i^{q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1}.

Now, let's compute the LpL^p norm of ff:

fLp(S;X)p=iIf(si)Xpμi=iI(μiq/pg(si)Xq/p1)pμi=iIμiqg(si)Xqpμi=iIμig(si)Xq=gLq(S;X)q.\begin{aligned} ||f||_{L^p(S; X)}^p &= \sum_{i \in I} ||f(s_i)||_X^p \mu_i \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} (\mu_i^{q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1})^p \mu_i \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^q ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q - p} \mu_i \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^q \\ &= ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}^q. \end{aligned}

So, fLp(S;X)=gLq(S;X)q/p||f||_{L^p(S; X)} = ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}^{q/p}. Now, let's normalize ff by defining f0=f/fLp(S;X)f_0 = f / ||f||_{L^p(S; X)}, so f0Lp(S;X)=1||f_0||_{L^p(S; X)} = 1. Then,

[Φ(g)](f0)=Sf0(s),g(s)dμ(s)=1fLp(S;X)iIf(si),g(si)μi=1gLq(S;X)q/piIμiq/pg(si)Xq/p1sgn(xi,g(si))xi,g(si)μi=1gLq(S;X)q/piIμi1+q/pg(si)Xq/p1xi,g(si)1gLq(S;X)q/piIμi1+q/pg(si)Xq/p1(1ϵ)g(si)X=1ϵgLq(S;X)q/piIμi1+q/pg(si)Xq/p=(1ϵ)gLq(S;X).\begin{aligned} [\Phi(g)](f_0) &= \int_S \langle f_0(s), g(s) \rangle d\mu(s) \\ &= \frac{1}{||f||_{L^p(S; X)}} \sum_{i \in I} \langle f(s_i), g(s_i) \rangle \mu_i \\ &= \frac{1}{||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}^{q/p}} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^{q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1} \text{sgn}(\langle x_i, g(s_i) \rangle) \langle x_i, g(s_i) \rangle \mu_i \\ &= \frac{1}{||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}^{q/p}} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^{1 + q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1} |\langle x_i, g(s_i) \rangle| \\ &\geq \frac{1}{||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}^{q/p}} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^{1 + q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p - 1} (1 - \epsilon) ||g(s_i)||_{X^*} \\ &= \frac{1 - \epsilon}{||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}^{q/p}} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^{1 + q/p} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^{q/p} \\ &= (1 - \epsilon) ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}. \end{aligned}

Taking the supremum over all f0f_0 with norm 1, we get:

Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))(1ϵ)gLq(S;X).||\Phi(g)||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \geq (1 - \epsilon) ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}.

Since ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 is arbitrary, we have:

Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))gLq(S;X).||\Phi(g)||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \geq ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}.

Combining this with the earlier inequality, we conclude that

Φ(g)(Lp(S;X))=gLq(S;X).||\Phi(g)||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} = ||g||_{L^q(S; X^*)}.

So, Φ\Phi is an isometry! This is a huge step forward.

4. Showing Φ\Phi is Surjective

Finally, we need to show that Φ\Phi is surjective, meaning that for every bounded linear functional T(Lp(S;X))T \in (L^p(S; X))^*, there exists a function gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*) such that Φ(g)=T\Phi(g) = T.

Let T(Lp(S;X))T \in (L^p(S; X))^* be a bounded linear functional. Since SS is atomic, we have S={si}iIS = \{s_i\}_{i \in I}. For each iIi \in I, define a map Ti:XFT_i: X \rightarrow \mathbb{F} by

Ti(x)=T(δsix),T_i(x) = T(\delta_{s_i} x),

where δsi\delta_{s_i} is the indicator function of the singleton {si}\{s_i\}, i.e., δsi(s)=1\delta_{s_i}(s) = 1 if s=sis = s_i and 00 otherwise. The function δsix\delta_{s_i} x is the function that takes the value xx at sis_i and 00 elsewhere.

Each TiT_i is a bounded linear functional on XX, so TiXT_i \in X^*. We define the function g:SXg: S \rightarrow X^* by g(si)=Tig(s_i) = T_i for each iIi \in I. Now, we need to show that gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*) and that Φ(g)=T\Phi(g) = T.

First, let's show that gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*). We need to show that iIg(si)Xqμi<\sum_{i \in I} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^q \mu_i < \infty. For any xXx \in X with xX1||x||_X \leq 1, we have

Ti(x)=T(δsix)T(Lp(S;X))δsixLp(S;X)=T(Lp(S;X))xXμi1/pT(Lp(S;X))μi1/p.|T_i(x)| = |T(\delta_{s_i} x)| \leq ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} ||\delta_{s_i} x||_{L^p(S; X)} = ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} ||x||_X \mu_i^{1/p} \leq ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \mu_i^{1/p}.

Thus, TiXT(Lp(S;X))μi1/p||T_i||_{X^*} \leq ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \mu_i^{1/p}, so g(si)XT(Lp(S;X))μi1/p||g(s_i)||_{X^*} \leq ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \mu_i^{1/p}. Now,

iIg(si)XqμiiI(T(Lp(S;X))μi1/p)qμi=T(Lp(S;X))qiIμiq/pμi=T(Lp(S;X))qiIμiq/p+1=T(Lp(S;X))qiIμiq<.\begin{aligned} \sum_{i \in I} ||g(s_i)||_{X^*}^q \mu_i &\leq \sum_{i \in I} (||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*} \mu_i^{1/p})^q \mu_i \\ &= ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*}^{q} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^{q/p} \mu_i \\ &= ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*}^{q} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^{q/p + 1} \\ &= ||T||_{(L^p(S; X))^*}^{q} \sum_{i \in I} \mu_i^q < \infty. \end{aligned}

So, gLq(S;X)g \in L^q(S; X^*). Finally, we need to show that Φ(g)=T\Phi(g) = T. For any fLp(S;X)f \in L^p(S; X), we have

[Φ(g)](f)=Sf(s),g(s)dμ(s)=iIf(si),g(si)μi=iIf(si),Tiμi=iITi(f(si))μi=iIT(δsif(si))μi=T(iIδsif(si)μi)=T(f).\begin{aligned} [\Phi(g)](f) &= \int_S \langle f(s), g(s) \rangle d\mu(s) \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} \langle f(s_i), g(s_i) \rangle \mu_i \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} \langle f(s_i), T_i \rangle \mu_i \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} T_i(f(s_i)) \mu_i \\ &= \sum_{i \in I} T(\delta_{s_i} f(s_i)) \mu_i \\ &= T(\sum_{i \in I} \delta_{s_i} f(s_i) \mu_i) \\ &= T(f). \end{aligned}

Thus, Φ(g)=T\Phi(g) = T, and Φ\Phi is surjective! We've done it!

Conclusion

Alright guys, that was quite a journey! We've successfully proven that when SS is an atomic measure space, the dual space of Lp(S;X)L^p(S; X) is isometric to Lq(S;X)L^q(S; X^*). This result is a cornerstone in functional analysis and is super useful in various applications. We started by understanding the fundamental concepts, broke down the proof into manageable steps, and conquered each step with careful reasoning. Great job sticking with it! Understanding these kinds of theorems not only deepens our knowledge but also equips us with powerful tools for tackling complex problems in analysis. Keep exploring, and happy analyzing!

  • atomic measure space: What is an atomic measure space, and how does it differ from a continuous measure space?
  • Bochner spaces: Explain Bochner spaces and their significance in functional analysis.
  • dual spaces: What are dual spaces and duality theorems, and why are they important?
  • Hölder's inequality: How does Hölder's inequality apply to Bochner spaces?
  • isometry (Lp(S;X))=Lq(S;X)(L^p(S;X))^*=L^q(S;X^*): Prove the isometry (Lp(S;X))=Lq(S;X)(L^p(S;X))^*=L^q(S;X^*) when SS is an atomic measure space.